We all like to think we're capable of making rational decisions.
Yet it appears when it comes to investing, a switch inside even the most sensible person seems to flick...
And rationality disappears in a cloud of emotion.
Being an investor isn't easy.
You have to contend not only with the erratic and unpredictable nature of markets, but also the sometimes erratic and irrational way in which you'll be tempted to think and behave.
All investors should try their best to make rational decisions and to make their head rule their heart.
Yet for many, while understanding that being rational makes sense, putting it into practice can be exceedingly difficult.
Benjamin Graham, one of the great investment minds of the twentieth century, famously said:
"The investor’s chief problem – and even his worst enemy – is likely to be himself."
Irrational investing manifests itself in many different ways:
The list of irrational decision-making opportunities is long and undistinguished.
John Bogle summed this up perfectly in an address to the Investment Analysts Society of Chicago (2003):
"If I have learned anything in my 52 years in this marvelous field, it is that, for a given individual or institution, the emotions of investing have destroyed far more potential investment returns than the economics of investing have ever dreamed of destroying."
The 'emotional cost' of investing can, at times, be extremely large.
By emotional costs, we mean the impact on returns that are caused by our own actions or inactions (i.e., our behaviour), rather than the markets.
The temptation to try to get in (or out) at the right time is huge.
Imagine if you could've avoided the 50% market fall during the global financial crisis of 07/08, or the blink-and-you've-missed-it COVID crash in early 2020, and bought in again at the bottom.
By and large, investors have a woeful track record of timing when best to jump in and out of markets.
It's worth remembering you have to get two decisions right when market timing.
The first is when to get out.
The second is when to get back in again.
The problem is that markets work pretty efficiently at reflecting new information into prices (of e.g. company shares and bonds) quickly, and thus every decision you make is a bet against the aggregate view of all investors trading in the markets.
Markets move on the release of new information which is, by its very nature, random.
The returns that a portfolio delivers are known as time-weighted returns.
The return an investor actually receives is known as the money-weighted return and will be impacted by the magnitude and timing of cash flows into or out of the portfolio, that they make.
A well-known piece of research from Morningstar’s ‘Mind The Gap (2023)’ report estimates this ‘behaviour gap’ to be around -1.7% per year on a large sample of US funds.
The 'bad behaviour' in this example is likely to be:
With biases including:
Let's look at an example of the ‘behaviour gap’ in action.
The chart below shows the fund flows of the largest index fund in the world - the Vanguard Total Stock Index Fund – plotted against the rolling quarterly returns of the fund (in GBP terms).
Following the COVID drawdown, negative fund flows persisted in the following months yet the market bounced back and was up 22% by the end of June 2020.
This is the behaviour gap in action.
The solution?
Own a sensibly diversified portfolio of the great companies of the world, with sufficient higher-quality, shorter-dated bonds to provide protection from portfolio falls.
This allows you to stay invested throughout these inevitable episodes of market turmoil.